rolex vsf vs gen | gen vsf vsgm rolex vsf vs gen after I received the VSF 126160LN I took my time to compare to gen. This is my measurements compared to gen 126610. Rolex Submariner Date 126610 Gen. Diameter: 40.5 mm. Lug to lug: 47.6 mm.
2.25K subscribers. Subscribed. Like. 4.8K views 1 year ago. Though you can use Dexron VI in place of Mercon LV ATF, there still arises debate on Mercon LV vs Dexron VI. So, we.
0 · gen vsf vsgm
1 · gen vsf vs clean vs ar
2 · gen vsf vs clean
3 · gen vs vsf review
#1. i have a Ford 6F35 transmission that requires Mercon LV, but i have access to large amounts of Dexron VI fluid for cheap, and i have a rather large stockpile of the Dexron VI. I see Many Brands of ATF that say: "recomended for Dexron VI/Mercon LV". So, are the specs so close on these two fluids that they can be used .
exactly, a comparison of CF and Gen would be even more impressive, physically closer. VSF next to gene looks very different in its case.
rolex presidentsl
Buddy let me compare my VSF Kermit/Starbucks (left) to his Gen (right). Looks like Imgur mi. I bought and wore a post-2021 Raid VSF Sub almost exactly 2 years ago. At some point I did a review which you can read here: Comparison: VSF vs Gen Rolex 126610LN . exactly, a comparison of CF and Gen would be even more impressive, physically closer. VSF next to gene looks very different in its case.
I bought and wore a post-2021 Raid VSF Sub almost exactly 2 years ago. At some point I did a review which you can read here: Comparison: VSF vs Gen Rolex 126610LN (CLICK ME) 2 years later (now) I bought another 126610LN from VSF (the older one is no longer with me) and I will do a quick update on the same points I noted 2 years ago. after I received the VSF 126160LN I took my time to compare to gen. This is my measurements compared to gen 126610. Rolex Submariner Date 126610 Gen. Diameter: 40.5 mm. Lug to lug: 47.6 mm. The overall shape of the VS is closer to the GEN, VS is better filled, the downside is the lack of rounding of the sharp edges, the other three are still mainly due to the lack of filling of the inner edges, resulting in significant gaps. Clean's chamfering of the scales is still excellent.
Despite being put through the gauntlet in overly picky and micro aspects between gen and rep, the VSF proved it had earned the right to stand as one of the best reps of all time. The VSF 126610LV gets a 9/10!
Buddy let me compare my VSF Kermit/Starbucks (left) to his Gen (right). Looks like Imgur might have destroyed the quality but looks amazing to me. Reply reply
The edges of VS don’t make a rounded transition and are a bit too sharp, clean does a good job. As we can see in Figure 4 below, Gen’s bezel is beyond the center shell, and VSF has a significant protrusion that is close to the width of Gen , .
LOW LIGHT VIDEO. Under low light, the green on VS seem to be a little darker. The winding on this movement is smooth. The bezel rotation is stiff like VS. In conclusion, Clean has done a great job with this new 41mm model. This is a great alternative now that VS is gone. The bezel shape of the VS factory is closest to the GEN, followed by the C factory, the GM oval shape is on the lean side. The JOKER's curved sharp corners are on the small side, and the overall brushed pattern is also the best restored by the VS!About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright .
exactly, a comparison of CF and Gen would be even more impressive, physically closer. VSF next to gene looks very different in its case. I bought and wore a post-2021 Raid VSF Sub almost exactly 2 years ago. At some point I did a review which you can read here: Comparison: VSF vs Gen Rolex 126610LN (CLICK ME) 2 years later (now) I bought another 126610LN from VSF (the older one is no longer with me) and I will do a quick update on the same points I noted 2 years ago.
after I received the VSF 126160LN I took my time to compare to gen. This is my measurements compared to gen 126610. Rolex Submariner Date 126610 Gen. Diameter: 40.5 mm. Lug to lug: 47.6 mm. The overall shape of the VS is closer to the GEN, VS is better filled, the downside is the lack of rounding of the sharp edges, the other three are still mainly due to the lack of filling of the inner edges, resulting in significant gaps. Clean's chamfering of the scales is still excellent. Despite being put through the gauntlet in overly picky and micro aspects between gen and rep, the VSF proved it had earned the right to stand as one of the best reps of all time. The VSF 126610LV gets a 9/10! Buddy let me compare my VSF Kermit/Starbucks (left) to his Gen (right). Looks like Imgur might have destroyed the quality but looks amazing to me. Reply reply
The edges of VS don’t make a rounded transition and are a bit too sharp, clean does a good job. As we can see in Figure 4 below, Gen’s bezel is beyond the center shell, and VSF has a significant protrusion that is close to the width of Gen , .
LOW LIGHT VIDEO. Under low light, the green on VS seem to be a little darker. The winding on this movement is smooth. The bezel rotation is stiff like VS. In conclusion, Clean has done a great job with this new 41mm model. This is a great alternative now that VS is gone.
gen vsf vsgm
The bezel shape of the VS factory is closest to the GEN, followed by the C factory, the GM oval shape is on the lean side. The JOKER's curved sharp corners are on the small side, and the overall brushed pattern is also the best restored by the VS!
gen vsf vs clean vs ar
Valvoline DEXRON-VI/MERCON LV ATF is a full-synthetic transmission fluid formulated with advanced additive technology to meet and exceed the requirements of the General Motors DEXRON-VI specification. It is officially licensed and approved by GM and is fully back-serviceable and can be used wherever DEXRON-II and/or DEXRON-III are .
rolex vsf vs gen|gen vsf vsgm
